Peer-Reviewed Scientific Articles
Annala, S., Lukkarinen, J., Primmer, E. Honkapuro, S., Ollikka, K., Sunila, K. & Ahonen, T. 2018. Regulation as an enabler of demand response in electricity markets and power systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, pp. 1139-1148. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.276
Apajalahti, E-L., Temmes, A. & Lempiälä, T. 2017. Incumbent organisations shaping emerging technological fields: cases of solar photovoltaic and electric vehicle charging. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Journal, pp. 1-14. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1285397
Berg A., Lukkarinen J. & Ollikka K. 2020. ’Sticky’ Policies – Three Country Cases on Long-Term Commitment and Rooting of RE Policy Goals, Energies, 13(6). Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061351
Bergman, J., Knutas, A., Luukka, P., Jantunen, A., Tarkiainen, A., Karlik, A. & Platonov, V. 2016. Strategic interpretation on sustainability issues – eliciting cognitive maps of boards of directors, Corporate Governance. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2015-0051
Happonen J., Heiskanen E., Matschoss K. & Mikkonen I. 2020. Epäonnistumisista oppiminen energiamurroksen tukena: analyysi empiirisestä interventiosta, Alue ja Ympäristö 49(2), Saatavissa: https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.91705
Hasan A. & Airaksinen M. 2016. The Role of Energy in Buildings in Smart Cities. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability 5(2). Available: https://doi.org/10.24102/ijes.v5i2.673
Heiskanen, E. & Matschoss, K. 2016. Millä kriteereillä paikallisia ilmastokokeiluja arvioidaan? Kahden vähähiilisen kokeilun case-tutkimus. Alue ja ympäristö 2/2016, pp. 45-58.
Heiskanen, E., Kivimaa, P. & Lovio, R. 2019. Promoting sustainable energy: Does institutional entrepreneurship help? Energy Research and Social Science 50, pp. 179-190. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.006
Heiskanen, E. & Matschoss, K. 2016. Paikallisten ilmastokokeilujen arvioimisen haasteet: Oppiminen kahdessa vähähiilisessä kokeilussa. Alue ja ympäristö, 2/2016. Saatavissa: https://aluejaymparisto.journal.fi/article/view/64899
Heiskanen, E. & Matschoss, K. 2016. Understanding the uneven diffusion of building-scale renewable energy systems: A review of household, local and country level factors in diverse European countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 75, pp. 580-591. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.027
Heiskanen, E., Apajalahti, E. L., Matschoss, K., & Lovio, R. 2018. Incumbent energy companies navigating the energy transitions: Strategic action or bricolage? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 28, pp. 57-69. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.03.001
Heiskanen, E., Hyvönen, K., Laakso, S., Laitila, P., Matschoss, K. & Mikkonen, I. 2017. Adoption and use of low-carbon technologies: lessons from 100 Finnish pilots, field experiments and demonstrations. Sustainability 9(5), 847. Available: hdl.handle.net/10138/267197
Heiskanen, E., Jalas, M., Juntunen, J.K. & Nissilä, H. 2017. Small streams, diverse sources: Who invests in renewable energy in Finland during the financial downturn? Energy Policy 106, pp. 191-200. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.013
Heiskanen, E., Nissilä, H. & Tainio, P. 2017. Promoting residential renewable energy via peer-to-peer learning. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 16:2, pp. 105-116. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1304838
Hyysalo, S., Lukkarinen, J., Kivimaa, P., Lovio, R., Temmes, A., Hildén, M., … & Peljo, J. 2019. Developing policy pathways: Redesigning transition arenas for mid-range planning. Sustainability 11(3), 603. Available: https://doi:10.3390/su11030603
Hyysalo S., Johnson M. & Juntunen J. 2017. The Diffusion of Consumer Innovation in Sustainable Energy Technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, pp. S70-S82. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.045
Hyysalo, S. Juntunen, J.K, Martiskainen, M. 2018. Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries. Research Policy 47(5), pp. 872-885. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.012
Hyysalo, S., Marttila, T., Perikangas, S., & Auvinen, K. 2019. Codesign for transitions governance: A mid-range pathway creation toolset for accelerating sociotechnical change. Design Studies 63, pp. 181-203. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.05.002
Hyysalo, S., Marttila, T., Perikangas, S., and Auvinen, K. 2019. Intermediate codesigning in transitions governance: Catalysing and channeling participant action. The Design Journal, pp. 873-894. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1661557
Jalas, M., Hyysalo, S., Heiskanen, E., Lovio, R., Nissinen, A., Mattinen, M., … & Nissilä, H. 2017. Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view. Journal of Cleaner Production 169, pp. 77-84. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034
Jalas, M., Rask, M., Marttila, T. & Ahonen, T. 2019 Strategic Research as a Mode of Academic Engagement:Assembling Smart Energy Futures for Finland. Science & Technology Studies 32(3). Available: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.65948
Johnstone, P. & Kivimaa, P. 2017. Multiple dimensions of disruption, energy transitions and industrial policy. Energy Research & Social Science 37, pp. 211-215. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.027
Johnstone, P., Rogge, K., Kivimaa, P., Fratini, C., Primmer, E., Stirling, A. 2019. Waves of disruption in clean energy transitions: Sociotechnical dimensions of system disruption in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science (39). Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101287.
Johnstone, P., Rogge, K., Kivimaa, P., Fratini, C.F., Primmer, E. 2021. Exploring the re-emergence of industrial policy: Perceptions regarding low-carbon energy transitions in Germany, the United Kingdom and Denmark. Energy Research and Social Science, 74: 101889. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101889
Johnstone, P., Stirling, A. & Sovacool, B. 2017. Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation ofrenewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 33, pp.147-162. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005
Juntunen, J. K., & Martiskainen, M. 2021. Improving understanding of energy autonomy: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110797
Kallio, L., Heiskanen, E., Apajalahti, E. L., & Matschoss, K. 2020. Farm power: How a new business model impacts the energy transition in Finland. Energy Research and Social Science 65. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101484
Kangas H-L., Ruggiero S., Annala S. & Ohrling T. 2021.Would turkeys vote for Christmas? New entrant strategies and coopetitive tensions in the emerging demand response industry. Energy Research and Social Science 76. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102051
Karjalainen, S. & Ahvenniemi, H. 2018. Pleasure is the profit – The adoption of solar PV systems by households in Finland. Renewable Energy 133, pp. 44-52. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.011
Kivimaa P., Laakso S., Lonkila A & Kaljonen M. 2021: Moving beyond disruptive innovation a review of disruption in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38: 110-126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001
Kivimaa P., Primmer E. & Lukkarinen J. 2020. Intermediating policy for transitions towards net-zero energy buildings. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36, pp. 418-432. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.007
Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M. Huitema, D., Jordan, A. & Newig, J. 2017. Experiments in climate governance – a systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production 169, pp.17-29. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027
Kivimaa, P., Kangas, H-L. & Lazarevic, C. 2017. Client-oriented evaluation of ‘creative destruction’ in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition. Energy Research & Social Science 33, pp. 115-127. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.002
Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. 2019. Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, pp. 110-125. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001
Korjonen-Kuusipuro K., Hujala, M., Pätäri, S., Bergman, J-P. & Olkkonen, L. 2017. The emergence and diffusion of grassroots energy innovations: Building an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 140(3), pp. 1156-1164. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.047
Kokoulina, L., Ermolaeva, L., Patala, S, Ritala, P. 2017. Championing processes and the emergence of industrial symbiosis. Regional Studies 53, pp. 528-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1473568
Köhler, J., Geels F., Kern, F., Onsongo, E. & Wieczorek A. 2017. A research agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network. Sustainability Transitions Research Network. Available: https://transitionsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/STRN_Research_Agenda_2017.pdf
Laitinen A., Lindholm O., Reda F., Hasan A. & Hedman Å 2021. A techno-economic analysis of an optimal self-sufficient district. Energy Conversion and Management 236, 114041. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114041
Laitinen A., Reda F., Hasan A. 2019. District-level energy matching tool for carbon-free concepts. 16th IBPSA International Conference and Exhibition, Building Simulation 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.211020
Lazarevic, D., Kivimaa, P., Lukkarinen, J., & Kangas, H.-L. 2019. Understanding integrated-solution innovations in sustainability transitions: Reconfigurative building-energy services in Finland. Energy Research and Social Science56. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.019
Lauttamäki, V. & Hyysalo, S. 2019. Empirical application of the multi-level perspective: Tracing the history of ground-source heat pumps in Finland. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 15(1). Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2019.1678372
Lempiälä, T., Apajalahti, E-L., Haukkala T., Lovio R. 2019. Socio-cultural framing during the emergence of a technological field: Creating cultural resonance for solar technology. Research Policy 48(9). Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103830
Matschoss K. & Repo P. 2020. Forward-looking network analysis of ongoing sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288
Matschoss K., Repo P. & Lukkarinen J. 2020. Network analysis of energy transition arena experiments. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, pp. 103-115. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.03.003
Matschoss, K. & Heiskanen, E. 2017. Making it experimental in several ways: The work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 169, pp.85-93. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037
Matschoss, K. & Repo, P. 2018. Governance experiments in climate action: Empirical findings from the 28 European Union countries. Environmental Politics 27, p. 598-620. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1443743
Matschoss, K., Repo P. & Timonen P. 2019. Embedding European citizen visions in sustainability transition: Comparative analysis across 30 European countries. Futures 112, 102437. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102437.
Matschoss, K., Repo, P. & Kaarakainen, M. 2016. Hallintokokeilut ilmastonmuutoksen hillitsemisessä – Analyysi kokeilujen kriittisistä tekijöistä ja alueellisista ulottuvuuksista. Alue ja ympäristö, 2/2016.
Matschoss, K. & Heiskanen, E. 2018. Innovation Intermediary Challenging the Energy Incumbent: Enactment of Local Socio-Technical Transition Pathways by Destabilisation of Regime Rules. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, pp. 1455-1469. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1473853
Mok, L., & Hyysalo, S. 2018. Design for Sustainable Transition through Value Sensitive Design. Design Studies, 54, pp. 162-183. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.006
Murto,P., Juntunen, J., Jalas, M. & Hyysalo, S. 2019.Devices and strategies: An analysis of managing complexity in energy retrofit projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109294
Murto,P., Juntunen, J., Jalas, M. & Hyysalo, S. 2019. The difficult process of adopting a comprehensive energy retrofit in housing companies: Barriers posed by nascent markets and complicated calculability. Energy Policy, 132, pp. 955-964. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.062
Murto,P., Hyysalo, S., Juntunen, J., & Jalas, M. 2020. Capturing the micro-level of intermediation in transitions: comparing ethnographic and interview methods. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 36, pp. 406-417. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.004
Neij, L., Heiskanen, E., & Strupeit, L. 2017. The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning. Energy Policy 101, pp. 274-283. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516306231
Patala, S., Juntunen, J.K., Lundan, S. & Ritvala, T. 2021. Multinational energy utilities in the energy transition: A configurational study of the drivers of FDI in renewables. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00387-x
Patala, S., Korpivaara, I., Kuitunen, A., Jalkala, A. Soppe, B. 2017. Legitimacy under institutional change: How incumbents appropriate clean rhetoric for dirty technologies. Organization Studies 40(3), pp. 395-419. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736938
Peixoto, I. & Temmes A. 2019. Market organizing in the European Union’s biofuels market: Organizing for favouring, acceptability, and future preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production 236, pp. 1-9. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.307
Reichardt K., Negro S., Rogge K. & Hekkert M. 2016. Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: The case of offshore wind in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 106, pp. 11-21. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029
Reda, F. & Zarrin, F. 2019. Northern European nearly zero energy building concepts for apartment buildings using integrated solar technologies and dynamic occupancy profile: Focus on Finland and other Northern European countries. Applied Energy 237, pp. 598-617. Available: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.029
Rogge, K. & Johnstone, P. 2017. Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: The case of the German Energiewende. Energy Research & Social Science 33, pp. 128-137.Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.002
Ruggiero, S., Kangas, H.-., Annala, S., Lazarevic, D., 2021. Business model innovation in demand response firms: Beyond the niche-regime dichotomy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 39, 1-17. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.02.002
Saikku, L., Tainio, P., Hildén, M., Antikainen, R., Leskinen, P. & Koskela, S. 2016. Diffusion of solar electricity in the network of private actors as a strategic experiment to mitigate climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), pp. 2730-2740. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.003
Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M. & Jordan, A. J. 2016. The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: learning lessons from the EU. Climate Policy 18(1), pp. 118-128. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248887
Schönefeld, J., Schulze, K., Hildén, M., Jordan, A. 2019. Policy Monitoring in the EU: the Impact of Institutions, Implementation, and Quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60, pp. 719–741. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00209-2 .
Sekki, T., Andelin M., Airaksinen, M. and Saari, A. 2016. Consideration of energy consumption, energy costs, and space occupancy in Finnish daycare centres and school buildings. Energy and Buildings 129, pp. 199-206. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.015
Sillman, J., Uusitalo, V., Ruuskanen, V. et al. 2020. A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches. International Journal of Life Cycle Assess 25, 2190–2203. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01771-3
Silvast, A., Williams, R., Hyysalo, S., Rommetveit, K. & Raab, C. 2018. Who ‘Uses’ Smart Grids? The Evolving Nature of User Representations in Layered Infrastructures. Sustainability 10 (10), 3738. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103738
Simola, A., Kosonen, A., Ahonen, T., Ahola, J., Korhonen, M. & Hannula, T. 2018. Optimal dimensioning of a solar PV plant with measured electrical load curves in Finland. Solar Energy 170,pp. 113-123. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.058.
Spodniak P., Ollikka K., Honkapuro S. 2020. The impact of wind power and electricity demand on the relevance of different short-term electricity markets: The Nordic case. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116063
Söyrinki, S., Heiskanen, E., & Matschoss, K. 2018. Piloting Demand Response in Retailing: Lessons Learned in Real-Life Context, Sustainability10(10), Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103790
ur Rehman H., Hirvonen J., Jokisalo J., Kosonen R. & Sirén K. 2020. EU Emission Targets of 2050: Costs and CO2Emissions Comparison of Three Different Solar and Heat Pump-Based Community-Level District Heating Systems in Nordic Conditions. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164167
ur Rehman, H., Reda, F., Paiho, S., Hasan, A. 2019. Towards positive energy communities at high latitudes. Energy Conversion and Management 196, pp. 175–195. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890419306752
Vand B., Ruusu R., Hasan A., Delgado B M. 2021. Optimal Management of Energy Sharing in a Community of Buildings Using a Model Predictive Control. Accepted in Energy Conversion and Management.
Väisänen, J., Kosonen, A., Ahola, J., Sallinen, T. & Hannula, T. 2019. Optimal sizing ratio of a solar PV inverter for minimizing the levelized cost of electricity in Finnish irradiation conditions. Solar Energy 185, pp. 350-362. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.064
Weiss, O., Bogdanov, D., Salovaara, K., Honkapuro, S. 2017. Market designs for a 100% renewable energy system: Case Isolated power system of Israel Energy. Energy 119, pp. 266-277. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.055
Wiedenhofer, D., Smetschka, B., Akenji, L., Jalas, M. & Haberl, H. 2018. Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 30, pp. 7-17. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.007
Teknologiakatsaukset
Ahonen, T. & Ahola, J. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Aurinkosähköjärjestelmät. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7270-8
Ahonen, T. & Honkapuro, S. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Kysynnänjoustojärjestelmät. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Kysynnänjoustojärjestelmät
Airaksinen, M. & Jalas, M. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Rakennusten energiatehokkuus. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Rakennusten energiatehokkuus
Annala, S., Honkapuro, S. & Ollikka, K. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Huipputeho ja varavoima. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7227-2
Ahonen, T. & Dukeov, I. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Tuulivoima. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7193-0
Jalas, M. & Ahonen, T. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Lämpöpumput, aurinkolämpö ja lämmön varastointi. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7147-3
Marttila, T., Jalas. M., Kangas, H-L. & Primmer, E. 2016. Energiamurroksen ennakoidut vaikutukset 2030: Biomassapohjaiset energiaratkaisut. Smart Energy Transition -hanke. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7136-7
Books and Book Chapters
Berninger, K., Lovio, R. Temmes, A., Kivimaa, P., Jalas, M., Heiskanen, E. 2017. Suomi seuraaville sukupolville – Taloudellisten murrosten käsikirja. Into Kustannus Oy.
Heiskanen,E. & Matschoss, K. 2019. On what criteria are local sustainability experiments evaluated? In Turnheim, Kivimaa & Berkhout (Eds.) Beyond experiments: Understanding how climate governance innovations become embedded.Cambridge University Press.
Hildén M. & Kivimaa P. 2020. Energy Governance in Finland. In: Knodt M., Kemmerzell J. (eds) Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe. Springer, Cham.
Hyysalo S. 2021. Citizen Activities in Energy Transition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Hyysalo S., Juntunen J. User Innovation and peer assistance in small scale renewable energy technologies, In Davidson and Matthias (eds.): Energy and Society Handbook, Oxford University Press.
Kivimaa P. & Temmes A. Low-carbon transition in Finnish mobility: The clash of experimental transport governance and established practices? In Debbie Hopkins & James Higham (eds.): Low Carbon Mobility Transitions, Goodfellow Publishers.
Turnheim, B., Kivimaa, P. & Berkhout, F. 2019. Understanding how climate governance innovations become embedded. Cambridge University Press.
Theses and Dissertations
Apajalahti, E-L. 2018. Large energy companies in transition – From gatekeepers to bridge builders. Doctoral Dissertation. Aalto University. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-8034-5
Erkkilä H-K. 2018. Kuluttaja joukkorahoittajana : Sähköautojen yhteiskäyttöpisteiden joukkorahoitus. Pro gradu. Aalto-yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201903051424.
Haukkala T. 2019. The wicked problem of a low carbon energy transition. Structure, agency and framing in the multi-actor process of solar PV deployment in Finland. Doctoral Dissertation. Aalto University. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-8501-2
Huomo T. 2017. Älykäs sähköverkko – Älykäs kuluttaja? Energiatehokkaiden ratkaisujen kotouttaminen asukkaiden arjessa. Pro gradu. Helsingin yliopisto. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/178532/Timo_Huomo_Maisterintutkielma.pdf.
Kivisaari V. 2016. Indirect impacts of climate change to Finland: impacts to hydropower production in the Nordic electricity markets. Master’s Thesis. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201606092316
Kolehmainen, M. 2019. Energiayhteisöjen toimintamallit ja lainsäädäntö Suomessa. Diplomityö. LUT-yliopisto. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201903189199
Lindgren, J. 2016. Renewable energy scenarios for South Karelia – non-industrial energy demands. Master’s Thesis. LUT University. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2016072122234
Nissilä H. 2020. Pursuing legitimacy for solar energy: essays on temporality and collective spaces in nascent fields. Doctoral Dissertation. Aalto University. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-8995-9
Ohrling, T. 2019. The Emerging Industry of Aggregation: Novel Business Models and Empowerment Strategies for Incentive-based Demand Response in Finland. Master’s Thesis. Aalto University. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201909295528
Ovaska, J-P. 2017. Emergence of mobility market platforms. Case: Mobility as a service in Finland. Master’s Thesis. Aalto University. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201708176690
Perflilyeva E. 2017. Yes it can! – State support for the development of renewable energy innovations in Finland. Master’s thesis. Aalto University. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201708176702
Pakkala, A. 2018. Grocery retailers & renewable energy adoption – a comparative case study on how and why grocery retailers in Finland invest in renewable energy. Aalto University. Master’s Thesis. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201806012892
Perikangas, S. 2018. Visualizing change – Collaboration tool for transition pathway creation. Aalto University. Master’s Thesis. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201805312875
Pyhälammi A. 2019. Talent management in a changing technological environment – Human capital in the energy sector of Finland. Master’s Thesis. Aalto University. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201911176297
Rissanen A. 2019. Potential of renewable energies for the Finnish agriculture. Diplomityö. Aalto-yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201908254972
Sallinen T. 2017. Aurinkosähköinvertterin mitoituksen teknistaloudellinen optimointi Etelä-Savon aurinkosäteilyolosuhteissa. Diplomityö. LUT-yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201704186173
Sillman J. 2016. Sustainability of protein production by bioreactor processes using wind and solar power as energy sources. Diplomityö. LUT-yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2016080922631
Söyrinki S. 2019. Kysyntäjoustokokeilusta näkemystä sähköjärjestelmän murrokseen. Pro gradu. Helsingin yliopisto. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/301474/Soyrinki_Siiri_pro_gradu_2019.pdf?sequence=2
Vanhala, M. 2017. Alueellisen ympäristöliiketoiminnan seuranta tilastotietoja hyödyntämällä. Lappeenrannan teknillinen yliopisto. Diplomityö. Saatavissa: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201706027014